Archive for the 'Blogging' Category

The Upward Spiral

May 21, 2010

On a forum I occasionally visit when I need a dose of the mentally ill to cheer me up, I read words that spoke of dangerously entrenched procrastination: “I finally know how to learn Spanish.” What I inferred from those few words, probably correctly considering their source, is that he has a desire to learn Spanish, but rather than learn the language, he has spent his time learning about ways to learn the language. By doing so, he deludes himself into the belief that he is learning something when he knows as little of the language as he did when he began.

I have been the same way. How long did I wait to begin practice on the violin? Sure, I feared that I would learn techniques incorrectly, and I probably would have, but such errors can be corrected; meanwhile, the time I wasted while in wait of a better method of practice has not produced a better violinist, but only a tardier one. Among my many demons, perfectionism is the most conniving of them all. It pretends to look out for my interest, but all it does is paralyze and procrastinate; I become a sloth with nothing significant to attribute to my name. It’s ironic that my fear of wasting time, whether in haphazard violin practice or in writing mediocre poetry, has resulted in the majority of wasted time I have suffered.

I’m much more active now than I was last year, because I no longer wait for agreeable weather or knowledge of optimal methods; I just dive into the activity, whether it be playing the violin, yoga, cooking, or writing. I no longer delude myself with the belief that the time would be better spent in research of better techniques, because I know I would not use the time to do research; I would simply waste it as I have all these years. It’s very likely that I’m developing some bad habits as I practice the violin, but I also know I’m developing some good ones, because the songs I attempt sound more like songs with each day.

As a Mac programmer once wrote, “Real artists ship.” Likewise, a decent poem written is far greater than an excellent poem imagined. It’s still a chore to force my flesh to do what I want, but I slowly gain the upper hand. As I practice the good habit of practice everyday, it becomes less of a chore. Eventually, it will feel unnatural not to do so each day. It’s like with flossing: There was a time when I anguished over the time and effort it took to floss my teeth each day; nowadays, I floss twice a day. That’s actually a bit of wisdom I read from a violin instructor: Practice until it becomes as habitual and emotionless as brushing your teeth.

I’ve been very productive this week. I dread the day I revert into the sloth, but I’d like to be optimistic enough to believe that such days are gone. However, that nagging voice of the spoiled manchild is as voluminous as ever. Fortunately, I now know the right answers to its cries. It demands that I rest my body and mind; however, I will be just as tired no matter how many hours I waste. It persuades me not to live such a tedious life where I repeat the same actions everyday; however, I have always lived a life of repetitions–and I believe everybody does–but the repetitions I practice now make me better. It threatens that failure is inevitable; perhaps, but if I cease, I will surely die a failure, so my only option is to try. With that in mind, maybe I am not ensnared in an infinite loop, but rather in an upward spiral.

There’s One in Every Family

April 19, 2010

There are actually people who believe that the vow of celibacy is why some priests molest children. I have a question for those people: When did teachers, doctors, directors, etc. take vows of celibacy? What? They didn’t? Yet, there are supposedly individuals among those vocations–and many more–who are guilty of child molestation. Either the idea that persons besides priests molest children is an evil conspiracy by the evil Catholic Church or celibacy is not why some priests molest children. I know these people will believe it’s a conspiracy–or possibly that these teachers and doctors are priests in disguise–but I’m willing to bet that it’s the latter: celibacy does not cause paedophilia.

Among these people are those who long for the destruction of the Catholic Church. Maybe the Vatican should burn for its corrupt leaders, but it’s definitely not the only city worthy of destruction: Hollywood and its defenders of child-rapist Roman Polanski deserve to burn in Hell just as much. Is there actually an organization out there that won’t defend its rapist-heroes? Unfortunately, I doubt it. The whole world deserves to be destroyed.

My point? Take the Catholic Church to task for their sins, but don’t be a fucking idiot and pretend that celibacy leads to child molestation. That’s as idiotic as somebody who claims that videogames lead children to violence when there are many non-violent children out there who play violent videogames and many violent children who don’t.

Fuck the Grammar Police

March 15, 2010

As I read Emily Dickinson’s poetry today, I came across a term I recognized but did not understand: Anno Domini. I checked the dictionary, discovered that it was the full form of AD, and learned something about AD’s usage: AD “should be placed before the numerals, as in AD 375.” My first thought was to travel across the blogosphere, look for blog entries with the incorrect usage, and post rude comments about how terrible their grammar is. While correcting the blogger’s bad grammar, my own comments would misuse ellipses, because that’s a trademark of pedantic pricks. Their other trademark is to contribute nothing to the discussion (or to life).

Maybe I’m too harsh on these pricks; most of them are only teenagers. I know I was completely anal about grammatical rules when I was younger. Eventually, I learned two facts that have made me more tolerant of “bad” grammar: 1) many rules, such as the rule not to split infinitives, are idiotic and not even considered canon by the gods of English, whomever they be; 2) the most badass writers do not always play by the rules. Nowadays, what matters most to me is that what I write be articulate; formalities are vain and often result in tinny, mechanical, lifeless prose.

Then again, when I was a perfectionist, I never did try to condescendingly correct somebody else’s prose, and if I were to, I would have made sure my own was primped and proper. The self-proclaimed grammar police do not worry about practicing what they preach because they do what they do for only two reasons: 1) because they’re bored and are too slothful to do anything more productive, and 2) because they need to bruise other egos to heighten their own, which sorely needs boosts to compensate for their miserable unproductive lives. They are not writers; they are trolls. Fuck them all!

nine inch nails is still ace

January 5, 2010

I admit I haven’t kept up with nine inch nails for the past few years, but they are still definitely one of my favorites. If you’re a fan of theirs–and why wouldn’t you be–then you should check out the website and download all the wonderful treasures there, specifically the DVD of an entire live performance of The Downward Spiral created by fans–very well made–and, Another Version of the Truth: The Gift, another DVD I am in the process of downloading right now. It’s so awesome how open and supportive they are to their fans.

The Pray’ng Bus

January 3, 2010

As all True Christians know, the Kingdom of Heaven will not be built with good works–not only are works completely unnecessary, but they are actually a sin. No, it will be built with popular-books-turned-into-multi-million-dollar-action-movies, wuss rock, hip post-modern celebrity pastors, and talking vegetables just as it has always been. However, as I skim through contemporary Christian culture, I notice a glaring omission among the many fads utilized: there are no Christian-based reality shows! This makes me weep almost as much as I do whenever the name of Our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, is mentioned. Therefore, I pitch this idea in the hope that some hip and youthful pastor will fashion it into reality; I’d do it myself, but I’m not tall enough, charismatic enough, or white enough to preach with authority.

Read the rest of this entry »

My Challenge to Nick Cannon

September 30, 2009

I have decided to challenge Nick Cannon to a sex-off. We will both bang Mariah Carey–I will call first dibs because I don’t want sloppy seconds–and whoever can pleasure her greater will get to marry her. I am sure that I will win the competition since I am a Scorpio and we are the ULTIMATE SEX GODS, but even if I lose, I will have had the chance to have sex with Mariah Carey, so who cares?

Some of you skeptics might wonder why Nick would agree to such a challenge. Isn’t it obvious? His honor would be on the line. If he refused, the entire world would think he was a punk ass bitch who is afraid to have his masculinity tested. Only by agreeing to allowing me to have sex with his wife would he save any face.

“What about Mariah?” you ask. “Surely she would say no!” Surely you are mistaken! As we all know, Mariah is a devout Christian woman, and as we know from Focus on the Family, women are supposed to submit to their husbands. Therefore, she would have to do what her husband told her or BURN IN HELL. You might think she doesn’t have to when his demand is essentially for her to prostitute herself, but acting like a whore isn’t a sin; Carrie Prejean AKA Miss Cali, who James Dobson totally loves, proved that.

So, Nick Cannon, if you read this blog, which I’m sure you do, then I hereby challenge you to the ultimate battle of honor! Are you man enough to accept my challenge?

A Modest Proposal 2: The Revenge of Jonathan Swift

August 26, 2009

So, as I read about the boycott against Whole Foods because its CEO is a libertarian, I thought about the healthcare issue once again. As somebody who will soon have healthcare, my opinion on the whole debate has changed. I now agree with the others who have affordable healthcare that America’s healthcare system is the GREATEST IN THE WORLD! It’s so obvious, isn’t it? I mean, when I look at all the benefits I’ll have, why would I want to choose a system that will set up a Nazi death panel to kill me when I start forming wrinkles (yes I know that’ll never happen since I don’t age, but allow me to be hypothetical for a moment)? It’s Ludacris! The best part about this system is that its completely voluntary and private (unless you count Medicare, Medicaid, Medi-Cal, etc.). If you want healthcare, it’s right there for you at affordable prices! If you choose to live life a little riskier, then you can save your money for an Xbox 360 or something. Since it’s that simple, it’s clear that anybody who doesn’t have healthcare is too cheap and lazy to sign up for it. And don’t give me this pre-existing conditions BS because I can easily disprove that with a single sentence: those who say they were denied healthcare because of a pre-existing condition are LYING! They’re probably a resurrected storm trooper working for Obama’s Nazi healthcare-reform propaganda machine. There is no such thing as a pre-existing condition. If you got diabetes, it was completely voluntary. You were asking for that multiple sclerosis.
I thought about this as I kissed my icons of Ronald Reagan and Charlton Heston and I wept at how bloated our government has become. For example, in my lovely hometown of Modesto, the police are stretched in all directions toward wild gooses and unable to deal with the real problems affecting the city. You always hear about how Modesto is the city leading in auto theft, but not once have I ever feared for the safety of my car, so it’s clearly exaggerated by the liberals who want nothing more than to disrupt my peaceful existence here with evil. The worst that’s ever happened to my car is that a window was broken and a few packs of gum were stolen. Was this the work of some mythical car thief? No. It was the work of teenager. Bratty goddamned teenagers who litter, talk too loud at Barnes & Noble, and jaywalk as I’m driving. I’ve never been mugged, raped, molested, murdered, or assaulted nor have I ever witnessed any of that. I’m not so stupid as to say it doesn’t happen, but it clearly doesn’t happen on the level the liberal newspapers would have you believe. At most, it happens a few times a year to people who go walking through downtown in the middle of the night looking for drugs or prostitutes. Why then do we waste our police obsessing over liberal myths when we should have them focused on stopping the real threat: annoying teenagers who irritate the hell out of me! Me! ME ME ME ME ME!
We as a nation have fallen far from the golden Christian utopia we once were in the nineteenth century. Now if you’ll excuse me, I’m taking my bourgeois wife to France on my private jet where we will eat truffles coated with 14k gold.
-In Christ’s Service,
The Monopoly Guy

Wayne Pacelle on the Ownership of Exotic Animals

July 6, 2009

It seems perfectly foolish on its face to keep a lion, a chimpanzee, or a Burmese python as a pet. These wild animals live by the unforgiving code of nature and they are fully capable of killing adults. A woman in Connecticut was severely disfigured earlier this year by a pet chimp. They can make especially quick work of children.

[From There Oughta Be Laws Against Exotic Pets - Wayne Pacelle: A Humane Nation]

I’ll honestly never understand why anybody would own an animal that has the capacity to kill them, especially if they have children. Such people are no more responsible than drunk drivers and should be found just as guilty of murder if their “pets” kill somebody. Just like a drunk driver, they know the dangers, but they don’t care to risk other people’s lives and therefore do not belong among civil society.

Hardened Hearts Help Nobody

May 25, 2009

Michael Vick, the NFL player sent to prison for his role in dogfighting, offered his help in the Humane Society of the United States‘ campaign against dogfighting. Wayne Pacelle, the president of the HSUS, wrote about his thoughts last week. He also shared a few of the comments he received. Most of them approached the idea of Vick working with the HSUS to end the very cruelty he practiced his entire life with understandable skepticism, but they were nevertheless willing to offer him the chance to atone for his crimes. However, there was one comment that really upset me: “I am a faithful supporter of the HSUS and can’t believe that you would welcome Michael Vick into the ranks… if Michael Vick is invited into the HSUS, I will no longer support the organization that I have held dear to my heart for so long.” I honestly just want to slap the woman right across her face!

She claims to be a faithful supporter of the organization and then threatens to sever her support if they do one thing with which she doesn’t agree. It’s not even something terrible. They are simply giving Michael Vick to help other men and boys ensnared by dogfighting; they aren’t canonizing him or condoning his crimes! Yet, because the HSUS is willing to give fallible people who make mistakes a chance to make right, she in her so-called faithfulness will turn her back on the organization that she holds so dear. I don’t think she understands what that word means. She only understands anger and vengeance and is willing to abandon a powerful organization that fights against injustices against animals. I’m sure she’d claim she’s acting in the interest of mistreated animals everywhere, but how is depriving an organization like the HSUS that fights against injustices against animals going to help them? It’ll simply rob them of the funds they need to stop the dogfighting she supposedly despises. If more people shared her hardened heart, the HSUS would even have to shrink their efforts against dogfighting, thereby ensuring that more –not less– dogfighting would occur. Would that bother her or would the pride she receives from her hardened heart numb her of any actual compassion and sense?

You don’t have to agree with everything an organization or church does to support it. If you did, do you honestly believe you would ever find such a organization?

American First, Christian Second: Christianity and Torture

May 3, 2009

As you might’ve read, an organization conducted a survey about Evangelical Christians and torture. The results? Most of them support torture. It honestly didn’t surprise me much. I found out about this on a blog on ChristianityToday. Surprisingly, it did not justify the support of torture, but actually argued against it with some very good points. It as well as some of the more insightful comments really convinced me that torture and Christianity cannot coexist.

The greatest point made was that the first question we should ask when it comes to torture is whether or not it is ethical. If it isn’t, then it is irrelevant if it works or not. After all, Christians condemn many atrocious practices based on the ethics alone: abortion, embryonic stem cell research, euthanasia, etc. Why should torture be any different? For the good of the nation? If the good of the nation requires us to sin against God, then to hell with the nation! Better to hate America and to love God than vice versa. The Israelites thought they were doing what was best for Israel when they sacrificed to Baal, but that didn’t appease God any nor did it absolve them of any sin.

How do we know if torture is ethical? One way is to ask ourselves if we would want it done to ourselves if in the same situation, whether we were found guilty of terrorism or simply thought to be terrorist by our nationality. It’s not surprising that the majority of people –some of whom I am sure support torture– would not want themselves or their children to be tortured themselves or their children to be tortured if they were found to be terrorists or suspected enemies of a nation they happened to be visiting. I doubt most people would want to be imprisoned without being officially charged with something either. They might even consider the act inhumane. It’s clear they consider it unethical when done to themselves, so why would they support it when done to others? Simply because their hypocrites. Is hypocrisy one of our spiritual gifts?

I wonder how many of them support the actions of the Spanish Inquisition of centuries before. They too tortured people for a greater good. In fact, one might argue that their goal was even more nobler than the goal we had with Guatanamo Bay: while the United States sought to save lives through torture, the Spanish Inquisition sought to save souls.

The second question to ask is not if it is effective, but if it is legal. This is much less ambiguous and debatable than the first question: it isn’t. Not according to the United States and not according to many official documents it has signed: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, The Geneva Conventions, etc. (Here’s a quick overview of the many laws that torture violates). Are we as Christians expected to follow the law? Of course! Even if there are laws with which we don’t agree, God expects us to follow them! Even Jesus said “Give unto Caesar what is Caesar’s” and I’m sure that the Jews didn’t much care for the Romans. God won’t honor us if we act like criminals. The only time we may break the law is when the law of the land requires us to sin against God. Are there any verses that state it is a sin not to torture our enemies? Maybe in one of the supposed lost gospels! However, not in the Bible. Therefore, by intentionally violating the law, we are sinning against God and making a fool of Christ. You might not agree with federal law or the United Nations, but federal law was begotten by the United States government itself and the United States voluntarily sacrificed a bit of its sovereignty when it joined the United Nations and when it signed those many treaties against torture. If we don’t like the law of the land, then we should change it. If we don’t like the United Nations or the treaties we sign, then we should abandon them and suffer the consequences. Until then, we have an obligation to be obedient. If we can ignore the government whenever convenient, then why should we be obedient to any authority, whether in government or church or work, except when it profits us?

Now, one could ask if torture is effective. Those who support it deem it essential and those who oppose it claim it’s ineffective. Personally, I don’t care either way because it’s already clear that torture is unethical and illegal and therefore contradicts my walk with Christ. Does the security of the nation precede our walk with Christ? Only if you love the United States of America more than you love God. Yet, as one commenter eloquently stated: “American Christians are American first, Christian second.” I don’t disagree at all. The idolatry of America by supposed Christians is quite evident. There have been efforts made to amend the Constitution to ban the burning of the American flag. How many efforts have been made to amend the Constitution to ban the burning of Bibles? The Bible represents something far more sacred than the flag ever will. I wouldn’t be surprised if most American Christians disagreed with me though. Last time I checked the Bible though, we could only serve one master. So, who do you love more? God or America?